rivka381 in post

interesting look on ISIS. Resistance to the New World Order (NWO), but doomed to failure due to a lack of understanding of the essence of this NWO.
Their Ancestral Gods helped the ancient Slavs for the reason (well, firstly, the planet was in the light of a galactic ray, and not at the bottom, as it is now), that they ASKED for help or asked for advice. For a long time of being at the bottom in darkness and the absence of the light of the Galactic ray, we are potentially such Gods, but not yet grown spiritually, have forgotten how to ask for help from our genetic parents. Our memory of their existence has faded away. So we live in a special school for juvenile delinquents with strict God-educators. And the regime is getting stronger. Everyone can ask for help from their KIND (these are thousands of our ancestors) up to the First Ancestors-Gods along the genetic chain and will help us. With each such appeal, the genetic chain comes to life, this is the channel to the Ancestral Gods, the genes wake up. who slept during the Galactic night. I agree about the substitution of light Gods for Dark ones, it was done very cunningly, for example, I have been figuring it out for more than a decade. Although it seems that the Old Believers were close at hand and communicated with the priests of the Russian Orthodox Church, both with yogis in India and with teachers. They took away the freedom of choice due to our ignorance. Even those who strive for the light fall into the trap of darkness. But with the heart it is easy to feel what energies are in what church or teaching. In the Russian Orthodox Church, only cemetery churches or cathedrals were left in stock. Only the Navi world worship, commemoration of ancestors and all, but the Slavs were distinguished by the fact that they GLORIFIED the Gods, i.e. there was a worship of the world of GLORY and RIGHT. As a result, in the real ROC, youth or middle age has nowhere to go in terms of energy, and the ROC has become a church of old women who think about death. Which corresponds to the energy of the cemetery churches.

"... And first of all, this is the understanding that people have a Sacred Right to Choose. If at present people remain indifferent to the rapid growth of the aggression of the New World Order and, like a herd of sacrificial sheep, enter the stall of all the restrictions created by the NWO, then after a very short time, only a short memory of service tasks in one job or another will remain from human consciousness. And nothing more. Grayness will grow rapidly, and soon the Earth will become discolored. gardener of wretched biologically unpromising material, with monstrous deviations in the genetic apparatus, with deformities incompatible with life without constant replacement either by alien organs or mechanical extensions that make a person a cyborg. encoded in the genetic experiments of cosmic bottom devil freaks... And everything will be repeated exactly according to the same scenario, which for eons of time has already been worked out to a mechanism and always acts until the population of any planet that has survived to the evolutionary stage of exit from the Cosmic Bottom of its system realizes its legitimate Right of Freedom and Choice and does not finally choose the direction to the Light. Then the spell of the forces of Darkness disintegrates, and they are no longer able to resist, since the action of the Forces of Light goes beyond their ability to influence. It's like benthic cancer can't affect sky bird when she flies. But when for some reason she falls to the bottom of the ocean, then she legally becomes the prey of cancer - a corpse-eater ... "

The Pan-Orthodox Council of 2016 as a Threat to National Security. Appeal to the public of the "Resistance to the New World Order" movement in connection with the preparation of the ecumenical meeting in Istanbul in 2016

It seems extremely important to convey to the public that in modern conditions the issue of the Pan-Orthodox Council in Istanbul in 2016 is not only an internal church, but also a political issue concerning the security of our state and our people . Currently, a war is being waged against Russia in the economic, financial, political and other spheres, but the main attention is paid to the ideological war. The ideological war, which takes the form of an information-psychological war, plays a decisive role in the destruction of statehood. This was clearly shown by the tragic events in Ukraine, from which proper conclusions were never drawn. Before the military events began here, a total restructuring of the consciousness of the Little Russians was carried out, in which the Vatican and its intelligence structures took an active part, acting through the Uniates and schismatics (who, in turn, are considered as a potential support of the Patriarchate of Constantinople), as well as Protestant and occult sects. In Ukraine, the ideological struggle has moved to a deep spiritual level , and this is the main area of ​​struggle - it is here that a fundamental restructuring and substitution of values ​​takes place, as a result of which the people . Before our eyes, the ethnos was reborn, and the "sovereign" people of Ukraine lost their sovereignty. This acts like radiation - it is not visible, you do not feel it, but it has the most devastating consequences. In the West, the information war has long been regarded as a type of special intelligence operations (for the first time in this sense, the phrase "information war" was used by Allen Dulles back in 1967). In the 70s. this term became widely used in the media, and it meant that information was considered not only as a target, but also as a weapon. Among the first official American documents on this issue are DODD No. 3600 - directive of the US Department of Defense in 1992 called "Information Warfare", which defined its basic principles. And at the end of 1998, the Committee of the Chiefs of Staff of the US Armed Forces adopted the "Doctrine of Conducting Information Operations", which for the first time confirmed the fact that Americans were preparing to conduct offensive information operations not only in the military, but also in Peaceful time . In peacetime, with the help of information and psychological operations, alien ideological and social attitudes are introduced into the population, false stereotypes of behavior are formed, feelings and will are changed in the right direction in order to destabilize public life and decay from within. These operations should sow fear and uncertainty about the future, create an atmosphere of discontent and anxiety, cause distrust in the activities of the authorities and government controlled, facilitate the emergence of opposition groups and stimulate anti-government activities. Such an information campaign prepares the ground for the successful implementation of political and military actions. The leaders of political and public organizations, religious communities, the most influential representatives of the business community, the military elite and the creative intelligentsia are considered to be the objects of special influence. Accordingly, the leading religious institutions in the West are or are in the process of being integrated into the system of global governance and are used today as political tools aimed at undermining Russia's national security. We are talking primarily about the Vatican and its orders, about the World Council of Churches. A special role belongs to the Vatican-controlled Patriarchate of Constantinople, which, already recognizing the primacy of the Pope, should bring the Russian Orthodox Church into the Vatican's orbit of influence. For this they use « interreligious dialogue”, which, in the context of the aggravation of the international situation and the transition of the West to an aggressive information war against Russia, is increasingly revealing its subversive nature and posing a real threat to national security, since the basis of the latter is spiritual security . "Interreligious dialogue" makes it impossible to preserve the spiritual sovereignty, the spiritual independence of our people. Blurring the notion of national sovereignty, it translates our people under the spiritual authority of that center which is outside of Russia, outside of Orthodoxy , this is the center of supranational, ecumenical power, creating world religion, in which Orthodoxy should be completely blurred. The Vatican is already built into this power, the Patriarchate of Constantinople is built into it, and now the Russian Orthodox Church is being built into it. Today questions of religion and politics cannot be separated, they merge to the extent that the super-politician who is being trained as the head of the emerging system of world governance will be religious. It is only in the light of this that we must evaluate the forthcoming Pan-Orthodox Council . This is where our attention should be directed. All attempts to arrange a discussion on the topic of whether this very last Eighth Ecumenical Council, about which our holy fathers wrote, or not, or with what degree of accuracy this corresponds to the scriptures, simply diverts from the main thing and is a distraction that allows present any resistance to ecumenical activity as deeply marginal phenomenon. Meanwhile, the majority of Orthodox are concerned about this activity, but they do not speak out, either because they do not have sufficient information about what is happening, or because they are simply deprived of such an opportunity. We have repeatedly written and informed our public that the origins of this idea are in the papacy, that the essence of the ecumenical policy of the Vatican is to achieve the transfer of Orthodoxy under the control of the Pope and his institutions. That is, we are talking about a new kind of union - informal union . It is this union that was concluded with Patriarch Athenagoras of Constantinople, zealous ecumenist, freemason,in 1965 by signing the Declaration on the Repeal of the Anathema of 1054. As a result, the patriarch not only declared the Catholic Church "sisterly", but also included the pope in the diptych of the Patriarchate of Constantinople: the pope became "the first bishop of Christianity", and the patriarch - "his second brother in turn". In 1967, Patriarch Athenagoras concelebrated with the Pope in the Roman Cathedral St. Peter. Thus, the Patriarchate of Constantinople recognized Orthodoxy for the heretics and, having avoided the formal acceptance of papal primacy, accepted it in fact. The declaration of mutual forgiveness turned out to be a more effective means of "union" than a formal union, since it eliminated the need to resolve theological contradictions by simply abstracting from them. This purely Jesuit method became a model for introducing other Orthodox churches into the fold of Catholicism. This mission is carried out Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, who, while remaining "his own" in the Orthodox world, is a conductor of ideas alien to this world. He must approve in Orthodoxy the idea borrowed from papism about visible head of the Orthodox Church with special power prerogatives, in order to put it under the control of the pontiff, whose supremacy he is ready to recognize formally (the norm for him is joint prayers with the pope and participation in worship). It is from this main fact that they want to divert our attention.. In accordance with the teaching of the Constantinopolitan theologians, if the Patriarch of Constantinople, being a bishop, is "first among equals", then as archbishop of Constantinople, he is "the first hierarch without equals". Accordingly, the primacy of the See of Constantinople is understood as a specific institution with specific powers and is embodied in the personality of the patriarch, who has special privileges, such as, for example, granting or withdrawing autocephaly. It is significant that one of the leading ideologists of this concept Archimandrite Lambriniadis outlined it shortly before the meeting in Istanbul on March 6-9, 2014, at which Patriarch Bartholomew called for the heads of the Orthodox Churches to gather. So everyone knew where they were going and who they were going to. Indeed, the entire Istanbul meeting was held under the dictation of Patriarch Bartholomew: he appointed when and where to meet, the order of representation, the procedure for making decisions by consensus, and he outlined the scope of his powers - against which no one opposed.
As we were told, the main outcome of the meeting was the general agreement on holding a Pan-Orthodox Council in 2016 under the chairmanship of the Patriarch of Constantinople and that decisions at the Council would be made not by vote, but by consensus (by unanimous vote). Moreover, each delegation will have one vote and express the general opinion of all its episcopate, clergy and the faithful people. But this means that the rules and agenda of the Council, the principles of its formation, the minutes of its divine services and meetings, the drafts of the main council documents should be previously agreed everyone Local Churches. Decisions made by consensus are known in advance. That is, a delegation (one vote) should arrive at the Council in order to simply approve the decisions with which everyone already agrees, since they have been reconciled .
However, having concentrated our attention on technical, procedural issues, we were not told around what, whom and with whom everyone will be reconciled. However, this clearly follows from the speech of Patriarch Bartholomew himself. First, he pointed to the vast experience ecumenical – « pan-Orthodox» activities the last 50 years (starting with Athenagoras), as a result of which " the decisions taken by all the Orthodox on the issue of relations with non-Orthodox. For all Orthodox Churches, these decrees were considered as obligatory, which should be implemented as the "internal law" of each of them». Secondly, he expressed dissatisfaction with the fact that autocephalous churches often behave like self-sufficient churches - developing their own position regarding the non-Orthodox. Adopted "pan-Orthodox" resolutions, that is canonical norms , were not observed by some churches, despite the fact that they themselves signed them. Such Churches act arbitrarily, developing their own position in relation to the non-Orthodox, allowing « illegal criticism" established regulations. "Only It is fitting for the Ecumenical Councils to challenge these rulings. In some Churches, church authorities are patient with such phenomena ... But, conciliar decisions must be recognized by all, for only in this way is the unity of the Church preserved.
Third, he concluded: All this highlights the need for some [governing]organ established officially or unofficially, which would resolve all emerging differences and problems in order to avoid divisions and strife... We must develop the consciousness of the unity of the Orthodox Church, and this can only be achieved through synodality... It's time to give back preference for unity: both within each Church and between Churches". That is a new supranational a regulating body (synod) that will elevate all to perfect unity - this body should be the Pan-Orthodox Council of 2016, after which, as we have been given to understand, other councils may follow. Thus, for 50 years at conferences they signed some (unknown to us) ecumenical documents of a binding nature, which can only be changed at the Pan-Orthodox Council, and now this needs to be fixed and make ecumenism a law, objection to which would be a crime. This is the main result of the Istanbul meeting. The purpose of the Council is to become appropriate body to legitimize the heresy of ecumenism. After Istanbul, the Orthodox community in Russia has repeatedly expressed its concern in connection with the preparation of the Pan-Orthodox Conference, but their appeals on this subject have not received any response. And the corresponding work continues as before - for behind closed doors, covertly, without revealing what is going on. Thus, at the end of September 2014, a meeting of a special inter-Orthodox commission for the preparation of the Council was held in Chambesy (Switzerland), chaired by Metropolitan John of Pergamon from the Patriarchate of Constantinople, engaged in editing texts that should be considered at the Pan-Orthodox Pre-Council Meeting scheduled for next year. It is significant that the secretariat of the commission was Metropolitan Jeremiah of Switzerland and professor Vlasiy Fidas- both represented the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Nobody knows what was discussed at this meeting. And a little earlier, from September 15 to 23, at the invitation of the Jerusalem Patriarch Theophilus IIIX meeting was held in Jordan III plenary session of the Joint Commission for the Theological Dialogue between the Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church to discuss the topic “Sobornost and Primacy” (it is significant that here, too, the co-chairs of the commission were Cardinal Kurt Koch and all the same Metropolitan John of Pergamon from the Patriarchate of Constantinople). The considered topic has long been promoted by the Vatican (recall the Ravenna Document of 2007) in order to: - Firstly, under the guise of a return to such an understanding of the primacy of the pope as it was in the first millennium (before the falling away of the Catholics from the Church in 1054), to substantiate the need for its acceptance by the Orthodox Churches. It is formulated as " new unity in the primacy and council in the third millennium”, while the rejection of the understanding of papal primacy as primacy of power there is no speech; - secondly, in order to strike at the catholicity itself, in fact abolish it, turning it into just an advisory body of the pontiff. However, it is first necessary to turn the catholicity into a synod under the leadership of the Patriarch of Constantinople, thereby ensuring the “openness” of the distorted catholicity to the acceptance of papal primacy. As Patriarch Bartholomew put it, due to “intra-Orthodox difficulties,” it was not possible to reach an agreement at the meeting, and the final result should be reached at a subsequent meeting. All the energy of Constantinople is now directed to achieve it, in which the papacy sees the "key for good relations" between the Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church, and which is increasingly moving closer to the Vatican. At the end of November, during the visit of the pontiff to Istanbul, it is again planned to hold a mass in a Catholic church in the presence of Patriarch Bartholomew, and then an ecumenical prayer service at the residence of the patriarch. After that some joint declaration should be signed. All these processes are taking place against the backdrop of the ongoing war in Ukraine, where there is an open persecution of the Orthodox, against the background of the activation of NATO forces near the borders of Russia and the aggravation of the information-psychological war against our country. Anti-Russian rhetoric was also heard at the Madrid meeting held simultaneously with the meeting of the mixed commission. Christian faith and the future of Russia”, which was attended by representatives of 29 European countries. Among them were the delegates of Ukraine, who tried to discuss the most important challenges of the European continent in the light of the social doctrine catholic church, concentrating on the supposedly existing military aggression of Russia. Almost all the delegates agreed with them, expressing bewilderment at the behavior of the Russian Orthodox Church MP, whose priests openly support those who defend Donetsk and Luhansk. While there was no talk of condemning the aggression of the Kyiv junta against the civilian population of Donbass. Speaking about the need for unity in the context of the persecution of Christians in the Middle East and expressing their main concern regarding them, the Vatican and the Patriarchate of Constantinople remain completely silent regarding the persecution of the Orthodox - the priesthood and laity of the ROC MP in Ukraine. It's not double standards, it's conscious policy aimed at the destruction of the Russian world and clearing the ground for the assertion of Western geopolitical dominance in Russia. Since the religious institutions of the West are used today as a political tool to destabilize and destroy our state, the question of " interreligious dialogue” also acquires a political character, the solution of which is possible only within the framework of the state approach aimed at ensuring the national security of the country. Movement "Resistance to the New World Order"
Osipov V.N., head of the Christian Renaissance Union, AninD.Yu., journalist, Kirichenko E.A., member of the leadership of the Movement "SNMP", Lemesheva T.S., journalist Nemchinova L.S., musician, Obolensky M.M., lawyer, Sokolov K.N., Ph.D., Corresponding Member of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Chepurnaya I.Yu., Deputy head of the Movement "SNMP", Chetverikova O.N., candidate of historical sciences, member of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems.

At this stage, we are not sure that the decisions of the Council will not be ecumenical and worldly. “That is why we believe that under such conditions it would be better NOT to CALL THE COUNCIL AT ALL.” At the same time, the Fathers rely on such luminaries of Orthodoxy as the Monk Justin (Popovich), St. Paisios the Holy Mountaineer and Blessed Elder Father Philotheus (Zervakos). It remains for us to add that we fully agree with this opinion.

APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF BISHOP

Your Holiness!

Your Eminences!

We, Orthodox Christians of Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldavia, members of the Movement "Resistance to the New World Order", accepted with satisfaction the refusal of the Orthodox primates at the meeting in Chambesy from Istanbul as a venue for the Pan-Orthodox Conference because of Turkey's sharp hostility to Russia.

At the same time, we are embarrassed that this Meeting will still take place, now on the Greek island of Crete. We perceive with great concern the very decision of Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, winner of the Gold Medal of the US Congress, friend and faithful ally of Washington, to convene this forum. Moreover, the decision of Bartholomew was taken almost immediately after the coup d'état in Kyiv inspired by America and the Vatican and the seizure of power in Ukraine by rabid haters of Russia, "Muscovites" and canonical Orthodoxy. In a situation fraught with a big war, such Councils are not convened. Unless, of course, the initiators of it have no ulterior motives, in this case, attempts to impose reforms that are detrimental to Holy Orthodoxy in the face of a military threat. And undermine the spirit of our people, break its spiritual core.

The idea of ​​such a Conference (or the Eighth Ecumenical Council) arose in Turkey, subject to Masons, shortly after the overthrow of God's Anointed One in the Third Rome, after the February catastrophe of 1917. "Freemasons" perched on the throne of Constantinople, one of whom Meletios the 4th Metaxakis already in 1923 organized a "Pan-Orthodox Congress" with the aim of the Reformation. Luther brought about the Reformation in the Catholic Church in the 16th century. Meletius in the 20th century took up the Reformation in Orthodoxy. The most significant decision of the Renovation Patriarch and his henchmen was the introduction of the Catholic Gregorian calendar so that Christians could celebrate Easter together with the Jews, which was strictly prohibited by the Ecumenical Councils. In 1924, the successors and followers of Meletios in the Patriarchate of Constantinople finally introduced the Gregorian calendar, and, alas, they were followed by the Greek and Romanian Church, and in 1948 the Antioch Church. The present Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, continuing the wickedness of his predecessors, intends at the 8th Council to impose the Catholic calendar on all churches, without fear of the anathema imposed on the apostates by the Local Council of 1583.

The Masons won the First World War and, having destroyed the traditional national and monarchical states, decided to consolidate their victory over the Church. And in 1965, Patriarch Athenagoras of Constantinople, arbitrarily, without the consent of other Orthodox Churches, removed the anathema of 1054 from the heretical Catholic Church. He also raised the issue of convening a Council and in 1961 committed against Fr. Rhodes First Pan-Orthodox Conference for its preparation. A list of 10 topics and 100 subsections was drawn up. Break so break. “The revolution has a beginning, the revolution has no end,” as the Soviet poet Robert Rozhdestvensky wrote. This huge list (including subsections), according to the Greek Protopresbyter Theodore Zisis, “was modeled on the list of topics of the Second Vatican Council, which, by a strange coincidence, took place at the same time and, according to estimates, INFLUENCED our church leadership.” The Second Vatican Council, as you know, completely broke Catholicism, turning it into Judeo-Catholicism or into the heresy of the Jews.

The International Theological Conference, held on January 21-22, 2016, with the blessing of Metropolitan Vladimir of Chisinau and All Moldova, expressed great concern about the secrecy of numerous discussions of the topics planned for the Council: “The final texts remain hidden and secret, they are not published.” Most of the bishops were not made aware of the materials of the cathedral.

And only thanks to the perseverance of the Russian Orthodox Church, personally Patriarch Kirill, was finally voiced main question the upcoming forum "Relations of the Orthodox Church with the rest of the Christian world." And then it turned out that the problem of the so-called. "dialogue" of the Church with the confessions separated from it, near and far. The active participation of the Orthodox Church in the Ecumenical movement is again emphasized. The task of restoring the "unity of Christians" is again set.

The Catholic Church after the Second Vatican Council 1962-1965 ceased to be Christian at all, and Protestant sects went even further from church canons, introducing a female priesthood, a female episcopate, approving same-sex marriages and even raising open homosexuals to the priesthood. What kind of dialogue with heretics who have gone into wickedness can we talk about? And what kind of "unity" with those who have come to the recognition of sodomy, can we talk about?

The document adopted by the Pan-Orthodox Pre-Council Conference in Chambesy in October 2015 and announced by the Assembly of Primates of the Orthodox Churches on November 21-28, 2016 states that the Georgian and Bulgarian Orthodox Churches left the ecumenical World Council of Churches in 1997 and 1998, respectively. For some reason, the dissenting opinion of these churches, as well as the position of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Moscow Conference of 1948, regarding ecumenism and the WCC were not voiced. We still do not know why the participation of the ROC in the WCC (where Protestant heresies predominate) continues. Why have we departed from the principled canonical position of Archbishop Seraphim Sobolev?

Patriarch Bartholomew, with his Masonic and pro-American position, having about 2 thousand parishioners in Turkey itself, however, claims not only primacy in Orthodox world, but also acts like a real dictator. It was he who, until January 2016, actually concealed the documents for the upcoming Council. It was he who reduced the significance of the Council by an order of magnitude, stating on August 29, 2015 at a meeting of the episcopate of the Patriarchate of Constantinople that this Cathedral cannot be considered universal, because "Christians of the West" will not participate in it; Heretics, Papists and Protestants.

In this regard, at the International Theological Conference in Chisinau, it was stated: “From this statement Ecumenical Patriarch It follows that the Orthodox Church is not the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, is not a Church that has fullness, but is DEFECTIVE.” And further: "We are on the way to the recognition of Baptism and the churchhood of heretics - papists and Protestants." At the Chisinau conference, 25 delusions or heresies shared by the Patriarchate of Constantinople and some churches from its team were listed. Why should we cooperate with those who do not recognize our Orthodox Church as One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic, but consider it defective? Why should we continue and expand the ecumenical movement, whose founders want to dissolve us and drown us in a host of alien heresies and confessions?

We are in solidarity with Metropolitan Vladimir of Chisinau and All Moldova and with the participants of the International Theological Conference (which was attended by more than 1,000 priests and laity) that the methodology of holding the Council and the topics of the main issues for discussion are not only “alien Orthodox tradition, but also consciously aimed at revising or even changing it. The last alleged corrections and additions made to the texts of previously prepared documents of the upcoming Council are kept secret. We all look forward with concern and concern to their publication in the latest edition, to see if our fears and concerns are confirmed or dispelled, but mainly to make sure that the self-consciousness of the Church will be properly expressed.”

At this stage, we are not sure that the decisions of the Council will not be ecumenical and worldly. “That is why we believe that under such conditions it would be better NOT to CALL THE COUNCIL AT ALL.” At the same time, the fathers rely on such luminaries of Orthodoxy as the Monk Justin (Popovich), St. Paisios the Holy Mountaineer and Blessed Elder Father Philotheus (Zervakos). It remains for us to add that we fully agree with this opinion.

MOVEMENT "RESISTANCE TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER".

Head of the SNMP Movement V.N.OSIPOV.

"The Ugly Tower of the New World Order"

At the conference "World Evil Against Russia", its participants proposed methods for saving the country and earthly civilization

Image: Imagno/Getty Images/Fotobank

The conference "World Evil Against Russia" (that's right, through i) was held in the Central Tourist House, organized by the Orthodox Revival Union and the Resistance to the New World Order movement. The assembled unanimously came to the conclusion about the offensive " last days”, but Russia has a salvation - to return to traditional values ​​and unite in the fight against Khazaria and the “electronic concentration camp”.

In the lobby in front of the conference hall, 30 minutes before the start, visitors began to arrive - mostly elderly people, good-looking women in headscarves (a badge with a portrait of Nicholas II was pinned on the clothes of one of them), as well as a small number of young activists. Visitors walked between the tables with all kinds of literature on the conspiracy of world Jewry, the dangers of the electronic passport, as well as the opposition to all this disgrace.

The three main leaflets, which were handed out to everyone for free, abounded with information classic in such an environment about the satanic barcode in which the number of the Beast is hidden, and also that in general all electronic documents are necessary for the Antichrist to have the tools of control over people in his hands. Especially unlucky was SNILS (insurance number of an individual personal account), "the key to all databases about a person who has all the signs of an apocalyptic mark." “This green card, to the delight of sodomites, provides for a change in the gender of the owner - pay attention,” the compiler of the leaflet noted.

A couple of men in their 60s exchanged remarks about the liberal politician Boris Nemtsov, who had been killed the day before.

He died for his Jewish deeds. Somewhere in an hour or two they banged, in St. Petersburg, it seems, - one broadcast.
- No, in Moscow, - objected the second.
- The Americans promised to increase the pressure on us - of course, they themselves slammed their own, - the woman standing at the table with thematic brochures confidently stated.

The conference hall, as well as the lobby, was full of impressive posters, which flaunted the slogans “To whom the church is not a mother, God is not a father”, “Holy Rus' is invincible!”, “Today - a number, tomorrow - a card, the day after tomorrow - a seal”, “We demand the adoption of a law on a traditional paper passport”. Most notable was a hand-drawn poster depicting a black crow holding an e-passport in its claws and a white dove holding an olive branch. The composition was completed by the inscription "No to the electronic concentration camp!".

Women in headscarves briskly scurried around the hall, looking for places closer to the speakers, took chairs, and more and more posters, flags and slogans appeared on the walls, which were carefully hung by members of the conference presidium. Before the start of the event, a mustachioed middle-aged man read the prayer “Our Father” in an anxious voice, which the audience picked up almost in full force. Dozens of voices repeating words in a sing-song voice in various tonalities created a frightening dissonance.

The publicist Vladimir Osipov, who is both the head of the Christian Revival Union and the leader of the Resistance to the New World Order movement, was the first to read his report. The very first words of Osipov, a man of venerable age who was sitting in a wheelchair, left no doubt about the essence of the “world evil”: they turned out to be Jews and Freemasons.

The speaker especially noted the services to Russia of the nationalist writer Oleg Platonov, calling him "a scout of holy Rus', who penetrated the United States and visited many important Masonic lodges, finding out their criminal secrets." Osipov said that, according to Platonov, the destruction of Orthodox statehood leads to the kingdom of Antichrist, and in the current situation, Russian Orthodox Church the only one who preserved the purity of the apostolic doctrine. According to him, at the beginning of the 20th century, power in European states passed into the hands of the Masons, and in the United States belonged to them from the very beginning. He called America "the territory of denationalized nomads preoccupied with things, goods and sex."

Osipov explained that Freemasons in the United States are oppressing Christians, fighting against the installation of Christian symbols in institutions and schools, and the Church of Satan has been accepted into the national council of churches in the country. The publicist said that more than a hundred Satanist chaplains served in the American army. “Against this background, permission for US military personnel to have sex with animals looks like a trifle,” he stated. The writer also noted that in 1987, "Mason President Reagan publicly acknowledged the important role of Satanism in modern American life."

Then Osipov began to denounce Karl Marx, whom he called "the main devil-worshipper", and his followers, talking about how Soviet authority destroyed churches and killed clerics. The collapse of the USSR did not bring any relief, because the forces allegedly came to power, openly worshiping Satan and orienting the country "to integration into the Judeo-Masonic civilization."

The writer did not bypass such an important topic as homosexuality. He said that if in the 19th century the proportion of people with non-standard sexual orientation in the United States did not exceed 2 percent, now, after the resolution of "propaganda", it has reached 25 percent. The leader of the "Resistance to the New World Order" did not explain where he got such data from (according to the US census, in 2010 the proportion of people with alternative sexual orientation in it is 3.8 percent).

Then Osipov briefly walked through the Vatican pontiffs - all of them, as it turned out, sold themselves to Masons and Satan. The writer said that Pope Pius XI considered Christians "spiritual Semites" and coordinated his decisions with the rabbis, and Pope John Paul II openly joined the Masonic lodge. Osipov was also displeased with Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, who allegedly is fully supported by the United States and is preparing for the eighth Ecumenical Council liquidate Orthodoxy in 2016 through a reformist policy.

The writer spoke about the reduction of the world's population in the interests of the "golden billion", the dangers of cosmopolitanism, and also did not forget to recall the "Dulles plan". At the end of his speech, Osipov added that the militiamen of New Russia are inspired by God, the tsar and the fatherland, and on their banner is the face of Christ. “We saw it on TV,” he said.

Osipov was followed by Konstantin Sokolov, vice-president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems. His task was to explain to the audience what is happening in the world.

According to him, Russia is the center of the world, and that is why the West wants to conquer it, making Russian slaves and servants. Sokolov said that the United States already has a large system of concentration camps waiting in the wings - objectionable residents of their country (Hispanics and blacks) will be sent to them. "You can dial REX 84 on the Internet and see how American concentration camps, railway prisons are prepared and mothballed now, multi-million stocks of plastic coffins are made," he informed the audience.

Sokolov also urged not to hope for the Russian government - after all, its multibillion-dollar assets are stored in the West. As an example of the pro-Western position of the state leadership, he cited the failed capture of Mariupol by the DPR forces, when the pro-Russian militias were stopped a stone's throw from taking the city. Sokolov also spoke about the plans of the world behind the scenes about Ukraine: it is allegedly planned to reduce its population to 8 million people and the revival of Khazaria with its capital in Dnepropetrovsk.

He, like the people who were talking in the lobby, wrote off the murder of Nemtsov as a provocation from the West, as a signal to gather the Maidan and "bringing the pro-Western forces into a mobilized state." Sokolov urged not to believe the "paid" Duma and the Federation Council, which "gave Siberia to the Chinese."

Orthodox lawyer Irina Chepurnaya began her speech with a story about how the Jews, linking their hopes for the restoration of statehood with the messiah, rejected the true messiah Jesus Christ. Now, according to her, the Jews are preparing a "voluntary unification of the world" under the control of the Antichrist. “The ugly tower of the new world order is being built,” she stated.

Chepurnaya saw the answers to these challenges in the suppression of passions, the recognition of Orthodoxy as the main religion in Russia and called for "begging for Holy Rus'." She also stressed the inadmissibility of introducing digital population identifiers in the country.

The man who heartily read "Our Father" at the beginning of the event turned out to be the Slavic philologist Ilya Chislov. In his speech, he, first of all, emphasized that now there is a battle between the Russian God-bearing people and the Jewish God-killing people.

The Slavist emphasized that the hierarchs of the Church should not attend the programs of federal TV channels - in the first place, the programs of the TV presenter "blasphemer Solovyov." “Now, if Archpriest Dimitry Smirnov would stand up, turn his back on Solovyov, then there would immediately be fewer sodomites and Masons, and supporters of the Maidan would retreat,” Chislov said.

He also lamented that in the area of ​​the Ukrainian village of Debaltseve "American, British and Israeli special forces were released from the encirclement under the guise of civilians." “The German Merkel flew in with Hollande to petition for the release of the Israeli special forces from the encirclement,” the Slavist was indignant. Chislov, however, urged not to demonize Western Europe and put an equal sign between Europe and the West, since "the fourth Rome will not be in Beijing and Orthodoxy remains the religion of the European race."

Although it may seem that the speakers were limited to brief abstracts, this is not so - if you write down each report verbatim, then the text would be enough for a medium-sized book. The next speaker, Nikolai Mishustin, head of the Moscow City Duma working group on protecting the rights of citizens from the UEC and families and children from juvenile technologies, could claim authorship of a whole section in it. But only a few of the issues he touched upon will be briefly summarized here.

Mishustin began his speech with a report on the success of his activities: it was thanks to the efforts of his group that the adoption of the project for the commissioning of the UEC (Universal Electronic Card) was postponed for two years. He noted that this period should be devoted to the fight for the cancellation of the project. “Either we will win this, or then little will depend on us,” he frightened the audience, stating that otherwise the government would “close up and become dictatorial.”

Ultimately, the uncontrolled collection of information will lead to the distribution of the population into several castes: the first, the creative class, will travel abroad and learn how to command the rest, the second will include workers and peasants, the third will be slave servants. According to Mishustin, only the scientific paradigm will be acceptable to the state, and supporters of traditional values ​​will be sent to concentration camps.

He ended his report with a warning about an imminent war, the main sign of which he called the increased activity of “black transplantologists”. According to Mishustin, a similar situation was observed in Serbia before the war - pest doctors who had gathered there began to cut out internal organs from all prisoners, especially children, for subsequent transplantation.

Before the adoption of the conference resolution, Tatyana Lemesheva, a member of the Resistance to the World Order movement, took the floor. Next to her lay an imposing stack of paper, clearly hinting that her performance would not end quickly. Lemesheva did not disappoint those present - in the middle of the report on Holocaust denial, as well as calls to ban the Jewish book "Shulchan Aruch" as extremist, many in the hall and on the presidium fell into an uneasy sleep. The speech lasted an hour and a half and became the final, most powerful chord of the event.

At the moment of its completion, half of the hall stood up in unison and began to make their way to the exits, but Irina Chepurnaya asked everyone to stay and vote for an appeal to the Jewish congresses, Israel and the UN with a call to pacify the oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, guilty, according to the document, in the war in Ukraine. Those present unanimously voted "yes" and rushed to the doors.

Any threat, be it real or only apparent as such, gives rise to opposition, that is, resistance. It is logical that , according to which some secret organizations seek to seize power over the whole world, which has become quite widespread, has led to the emergence of people who are ready to fight such a threat. Resistance to the new world order is primarily theoretical in nature, since this order is usually considered in a theoretical vein. However, for last years social currents were formed, whose activities can be qualified as a struggle against the impending new world order.

Unwilling to live in a new world

To the greatest extent of the real-life social movements and organizations, the title of fighters with the new world order correspond to the anti-globalists. At the turn of the 20th-21st centuries, it became obvious not only that the world is developing according to the globalization scenario, but also that this scenario implies many negative consequences. Anti-globalists are extremely diverse in their political, philosophical, religious and other views. Until now, there is no official political party or organization for which anti-globalism would be the basis of the ideological platform.

Speaking out against certain areas of anti-globalism, or, more rarely, against the given phenomenon itself, is always an addition to some basic ideas and values ​​of a particular organization. The semi-official date for the birth of the anti-globalization movement is December 1999. Then in the American Seattle there were mass demonstrations and riots against the summit of the World Trade Organization (WTO) being held at that moment in the city. Active protests against the activities of the WTO became the first unifying slogan, on the basis of which anarchists, left-wing radicals, nationalists of various persuasions and ranks, environmentalists, representatives of alternative religious teachings and many others.

• opposing the policy of international financial organizations responsible for perpetuating the unequal position of developed and developing countries. First of all, these are the WTO, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank. Anti-globalists are sure that the policy of these institutions is aimed at protecting the interests of developed countries and preventing the development of the “third world” countries;
• rejection of modern standards of the global socio-economic sphere, in which the main benefits and resources go to a minority (“golden billion”), while the majority of the population does not receive decent living conditions;
• the dominance of transnational corporations, which, firstly, contribute to the maximum division of labor in the international market, relegating the inhabitants of developing countries to the role of cheap unskilled labor. Secondly, transnational corporations are an alternative and opponent of nation-states, which naturally prevent the receipt of superprofits. For this reason, according to anti-globalists, corporations contribute to destabilizing the very structure of sovereign states so that they can be more easily manipulated;
• predatory exploitation by mankind of natural resources and a criminal attitude towards environment. This is fraught both from a socio-economic point of view and in terms of the elementary survival of mankind. In the first case, resources are pumped out in the interests of the "golden billion", and the rest of the population does not receive any dividends from this. In addition, the lack of attention to the environmental problem can put humanity on the brink of disaster in just a few generations;
• the standards of mass popular culture imposed on the modern generation through the media and communications, leading to the intellectual, moral and creative degradation of people.

From the "Black Block" to homegrown fighters against world evil

As concrete examples modern organizations, the ideology, values ​​and nature of whose activities allow us to classify them as anti-globalists, we can name two movements. The first of these is the "Black Bloc", a movement of radical anti-globalists. The brutal name is not accidental: the members of this organization, which appeared in Germany in the 1980s, wear black clothes and hide their faces behind black masks. In connection with their frequent clashes with the forces of law and order and participation in actions of disobedience, such a dress code is quite understandable. The foundations of the organization are anarchists, but they are joined by other opponents of capitalism, a strong state and globalization.

The "Black Bloc" consistently speaks:

• against private ownership of the means of production and real estate;
• against the state as an instrument of control over a person;
• against any form of discrimination;
• against the existence of a repressive apparatus (police, army, and so on);
• against the reckless and not motivated by the real needs of mankind exploitation of nature;
• against mass modern culture, mass media, planting the "cult of consumption";
• ultimately - for a worldwide anti-capitalist libertarian (that is, rejecting all forms of organized violence) revolution.

In Russia, anti-globalism, like almost any phenomenon on a national basis, has transformed into an interesting phenomenon known as the World Order Resistance Movement. It was created in 2013 and positions itself as an organization to fight against the coming world order. The ideological basis of this movement is anti-globalism, modern eschatologism (expectation of the near End of the World), rather primitively understood provisions of Orthodoxy, confidence in the existence of a Masonic conspiracy, the purpose of which is to establish the kingdom of Antichrist on the ground. Thus, the ideological content consists of many conspiracy theories in a religious Orthodox shell.

According to the participants of the World Order Resistance Movement, the end of the world predicted in Christianity and the totalitarian satanic regime that preceded it, the same new world order, is approaching. Its ideological orientation is defined as anti-Christian, and the trends of modern globalization are regarded as clear signs of its approach. It is curious that at the same time, theoretical issues and practical skills of autonomous survival in a post-apocalyptic world after the death of an advanced civilization are actively studied. To this end, it is considered how to master the basics of gathering, hunting, fishing, running your own agricultural economy, basic crafts, the basics of medicine and applied science.

Alexander Babitsky